Skip to content
Crystal Roulette Space

Tetris Wouldn't Win at The Game Awards — A New Category May Address This Issue

Whenever a prominent honors show approaches, one notices a clamor to include fresh award types to honor overlooked contributions and satisfy the spirits of enthusiasts who have specialized interests.

Another commentator previously argued advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. So would board games, which is a passionate advocate's mission. However, I must insist when I prioritize because like all single-minded supporters, I have a cast-iron argument backing this proposal stands as crucial and significant. Here's the proposal: There should be an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; it’s very subjective, and inevitably generate discussions and end in fuzzy definitions. This explains why film award organizations steer clear of genre categories. But it is a necessary evil for the industry of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse they barely qualify a single creative category.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to compete fairly, specific award classifications remain vital.

Current Gaming Award Categories

The major gaming awards offer these genre categories for Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these classifications effectively encompass numerous genres, and you can find room for numerous titles.

Not so for brain-teasing titles. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Think about these outstanding current releases, showing diverse approaches: structural challenges from a specific release, fast-paced pattern recognition from another release, thought-provoking social scenarios of a third title. Which classification works within current classifications? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles launched regularly lacking appropriate categories at major award shows, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive small studio competitions.

  • One classic puzzle game wasn’t nominated in any category that year
  • Another creative title received no nominations that year
  • A beloved organization game was overlooked recently
  • Limited numbers of brain-teasers managed to sneak into niche award types

Significance of Puzzle Games

Commonly they're compact experiences, however the design of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games count as most engaged experiences globally continuing this trend for over a decade.

The famous puzzle experience challenges famous sandbox experiences competing to become most purchased experience; it additionally competes for best game of all time. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, and they are in conversation with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter such difficulty. It would be easy to populate five nominees engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude many worthy titles.

To emphasize again, these are games lacking appropriate categories in important events. Logic title developers are working at the demanding boundary of video game design, creating some of the purest expressions of the video game form. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they merit acknowledgment. Don't make them wait 35 years.

LT
About the author

Lori Thomas

An astrophysicist and science communicator passionate about making space accessible through engaging articles and cosmic storytelling.

Crystal Roulette Space

Type to search articles.